http://blog.robwebb2k.com/2008/02/08/linkedin-research-networklinkedin-experts-part-ii/ Startups, technology and whatnot. Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:34:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://blog.robwebb2k.com/2008/02/08/linkedin-research-networklinkedin-experts-part-ii/#comment-1332 Peter Carmichael Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:46:55 +0000 http://robwebb2k.wordpress.com/?p=202#comment-1332 Rob - If the expert network subscription service is dead, why is everyone and their mother chasing after Gerson Lehrman Group, including LinkedIn, your firm, etc.? It's not about having the software without the inventory and controls or having the inventory without the software and controls -- it's about having the whole solution to deliver to the client --> software, compliance, inventory, accnt mgmt. That's why LinkedIn can't crack in, or others for that matter... Rob – If the expert network subscription service is dead, why is everyone and their mother chasing after Gerson Lehrman Group, including LinkedIn, your firm, etc.? It’s not about having the software without the inventory and controls or having the inventory without the software and controls — it’s about having the whole solution to deliver to the client –> software, compliance, inventory, accnt mgmt. That’s why LinkedIn can’t crack in, or others for that matter…

]]> http://blog.robwebb2k.com/2008/02/08/linkedin-research-networklinkedin-experts-part-ii/#comment-1293 LinkedIn quietly launches Research Network and DirectAds…let the monetization begin. « RobWebb2k Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:46:02 +0000 http://robwebb2k.wordpress.com/?p=202#comment-1293 [...] week LinkedIn quietly launched the LinkedIn Research Network, a product the company first mentioned back in February. No formal announcement of the actual launch was made on the LinkedIn blog or anywhere else, but [...] [...] week LinkedIn quietly launched the LinkedIn Research Network, a product the company first mentioned back in February. No formal announcement of the actual launch was made on the LinkedIn blog or anywhere else, but [...]

]]>